ABSTRACT
Background: Acute liver failure (ALF) in childhood is defined as biochemical evidence of liver injury, absence of known chronic liver disease and coagulopathy not corrected by vitamin K administration, with INR greater than 1.5 if the patient has encephalopathy or greater than 2.0 if the patient does not have encephalopathy. Objective: Report the experience of a single liver transplant center (LT) in the treatment of 8 children with ALF and review the literature. Method: Retrospective review of clinical charts of patients with ALF. Results: The median age was 8 years-old (range 0-11), three females. Five patients underwent LT. Two patients died, one of them LT. The etiologies were 4 undetermined, 1 autoimmune, 1 Wilson Disease, 1 Parvo virus and 1 chronic graft rejection. All grafts were from cadaver donor, 3 of them reduced. Two out of five patients with encephalopathy grade III-IV died. The one year survival rate was 75 percent. Conclusions: Children with ALF should be treated in experienced centers with facilities for liver transplant. Transplantation should be offered only if the underlying disease is treatable by liver replacement and if transplant prognosis is better than that of the underlying disease.
Falla hepática fulminante (FHF) en la infancia se define como evidencia bioquímica de daño hepático, sin antecedentes conocidos de enfermedad hepática crónica, coagulopatía no corregida por la administración de vitamina K e INR superior a 1,5 si el paciente tiene encefalopatía o superior a 2 si no tiene encefalopatía. Objetivo: Presentar la experiencia de un centro de trasplante hepático (TH) en el tratamiento de 8 niños con FHF y revisar la literatura. Pacientes y Método: Revisión retrospectiva de la historia clínica de pacientes con FHF. Resultados: La edad media fue de 8 años, rango 0-11, tres sexo femenino. Cinco pacientes fueron sometidos a TH. Dos pacientes fallecieron, uno de ellos con TH. La etiología fue indeterminada en 4 pacientes, 1 autoinmune, 1 enfermedad de Wilson, 1 parvovirus y 1 rechazo crónico del injerto. Todos los injertos fueron de donante cadáver, 3 de ellos reducidos. Dos de cinco pacientes con encefalopatía grado III-IV fallecieron. La tasa de sobrevida al año fue de 75 por ciento. Conclusión: El manejo de la FHF debe realizarse en un centro con capacidad de realizar TH, aunque no todos los pacientes requerirán finalmente esta terapia. El TH debiera ser ofrecido sólo si la enfermedad subyacente es tratable con reemplazo hepático y si el pronóstico del TH es mejor que el de la enfermedad misma.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Liver Failure, Acute/surgery , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Liver Failure, Acute/mortality , Liver Failure, Acute/therapy , Graft Rejection , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Liver TransplantationABSTRACT
Sirolimus (SRL) is an immunosuppressive drug increasingly used in children undergoing solid organ transplantation. SRL does not cause glucose intolerance, hypertension, nephrotoxicity or neurotoxicity offering significant potential advantages over calceneurin inhibitors (CM). Aim: To report five children treated with SRL. Material and methods: A retrospective review of four children undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and one undergoing renal transplantation with recurrent acute rejection (RAR), chronic rejection (CR) or toxicity due to CM, treated with SRL between June 2001 and November 2006. Results: As primary immunosuppressive therapy, all patients received 3 drugs: CM (Tacrolimus (FK) or Cyclosporine), mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. Mean age at treatment with SRL was 98 months. Children undergoing OLT had a ¡ate introduction of SRL (mean time after OLT: 37 months), and mean follow-up was 24 months. In this group rescue indications of SRL were RAR in one, CR in one, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) in one, food allergy in one and other CM toxicity in three. Only one did not experience adverse events due to SRL, but no one required discontinuation of SRL. There were remissions of RAR, CR, TTP and food allergy. The patient with RT was switched from FK to SRL at day 18th after RT, but he had severe neutropenia that led to discontinuation of SRL. Conclusions: SRL may be useful in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients suffering from RAR, CR, TTP, food allergy and CM toxicity. Careful attention should be directed to detect side effects and avoid severe complications.